CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

The verdict

Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is maneuverability: CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid scores 74 against 66 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 — an 8-point gap. They are effectively level on control, stability, touch, so those traits should not decide the purchase. CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid is $62.99000000000001 cheaper at $270.

• Maneuverability

  CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid leads by 8 points (74 vs 66).

• Swing weight

  Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 6 points (82 vs 76).

• Power

  Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 5 points (95 vs 90).

• Plow through

  Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 5 points (93 vs 88).

Which one is right for your level?

Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.

Which one should you buy?

CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 FAQ

Which is better, the CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.1 vs 86.9), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — maneuverability — CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid leads by 8 points.

Which one is faster at the kitchen line?

CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid, at 115 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.

Which paddle has more power, the CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 95 for power against 90 for CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid. That comes from a 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core swinging at 118 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.

Which one gives more control and touch?

CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid at 86 versus 84. Its 14 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.

Which paddle spins the ball more?

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 91 for spin off its Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face, against 90 for the Raw T700 carbon face on CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid. In practice a 1-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.

Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?

Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 88 on forgiveness despite twist weights of 7 and 7.2.

Is the price difference worth it?

CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid costs $270, $62.99000000000001 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.

Do they use the same core and face?

CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid: 14 mm Full TruFoam injected core with a Raw T700 carbon face. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16: 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core with a Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face.

Which is better for a two-handed backhand?

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, at 5.8 in of handle against 5.5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 avoids.

Which one is better for beginners?

CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 90 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.

Which is lighter in the hand?

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 at 8.25 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (118 vs 115) is what you feel mid-rally.

Is it worth upgrading from the CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid to the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?

Only if you need what it actually adds. CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid leads on maneuverability by 8 points; everything else is within 6 points. At $270 vs $332.99, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.

Also worth comparing

Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.

• CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs 1X TruFoam Power
• CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Labs 008 Project 16
• CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Mach 2 Forza 16
• CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Agassi Pro 16

• Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Ultré Power 2
• Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs 1X TruFoam Power
• Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Hyperion Pro V 16
• Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Labs 008 Project 16

Top alternatives to both

Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.

Read the full reviews: CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.