CRBN-2X Square vs JOOLA Radius CGS 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. CRBN-2X Square takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
CRBN-2X Square edges it on the overall Paddle IQ score (87.3 vs 86.1), but the two split the scored categories — pick on the one trait you care about most.
Power
Too close to call
80 vs 79
Spin
96 vs 88
Control
Too close to call
91 vs 89
Forgiveness
Too close to call
90 vs 89
Hand speed
108 vs 117 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Too close to call
$229 at IQ 87.3 vs $230 at IQ 86.1
Overall pick: CRBN-2X Square · $229 · IQ 87.3
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 80Power79
- 89Control91
- 96Spin88
- 89Forgiveness90
- 92Sweet spot92
- 91Stability86
- 71Maneuverability78
- 74Pop74
- 86Touch89
- 88Consistency88
- 76Swing weight68
- 94Twist weight82
- 55Launch angle50
- 78Plow through78
- 80Softness82
CRBN-2X Square vs JOOLA Radius CGS 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | CRBN-2X Square | JOOLA Radius CGS 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $229 — better | $230 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 87.3 — better | 86.1 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 117 | 108 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 7.1 — better | 6.8 |
| Shape | widebody | widebody |
| Face length(in) | 15.75 | 15.9 |
| Face width(in) | 8 | 8.1 |
| Handle length(in) | 4.75 | 5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw T700 carbon peel-ply | Charged Surface Technology carbon |
| Core material | Polypropylene | Reactive Polymer Core |
CRBN-2X Square verdict
A spin specialist with unusually stable handling through fast exchanges at the kitchen. The square face produces the highest twist weight in our database.
JOOLA Radius CGS 16 verdict
JOOLA's widebody answer to the elongated arms race. The extra face width buys one of the largest sweet-spot scores in the lineup, and the twist weight is high enough that mishits still come back deep.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is twist weight: CRBN-2X Square scores 94 against 82 for JOOLA Radius CGS 16 — a 12-point gap. They are effectively level on touch, control, softness, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($229 vs $230) that it should not break the tie.
Twist weight
CRBN-2X Square leads by 12 points (94 vs 82).
Spin
CRBN-2X Square leads by 8 points (96 vs 88).
Swing weight
CRBN-2X Square leads by 8 points (76 vs 68).
Maneuverability
JOOLA Radius CGS 16 leads by 7 points (78 vs 71).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
CRBN-2X Square
CRBN-2X Square is a narrow pick at this level — twist weight 94 vs 82, stability 91 vs 86. Twist weight 7.1 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Twist weight
- Stability
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (85.4 vs 86 on the weighted index). Pick on handle length — 4.75 in on the CRBN-2X Square, 5 in on the Radius CGS 16.
- Maneuverability
- Touch
- Control
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (84 vs 83.8 on the weighted index). Pick on handle length — 4.75 in on the CRBN-2X Square, 5 in on the Radius CGS 16.
- Spin
- Power
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (85 vs 84.2 on the weighted index). Pick on handle length — 4.75 in on the CRBN-2X Square, 5 in on the Radius CGS 16.
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
CRBN-2X Square
Take CRBN-2X Square if you want twist weight (+12), spin (+8), swing weight (+8). Its swing weight of 117 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the CRBN-2X Square review →JOOLA Radius CGS 16
Take JOOLA Radius CGS 16 if you want maneuverability (+7). Its swing weight of 108 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Radius CGS 16 review →CRBN-2X Square vs JOOLA Radius CGS 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the CRBN-2X Square or the JOOLA Radius CGS 16?
- CRBN-2X Square carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.3 vs 86.1), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — twist weight — CRBN-2X Square leads by 12 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16, at 108 kg·cm² swing weight against 117 for CRBN-2X Square. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the CRBN-2X Square or the JOOLA Radius CGS 16?
- CRBN-2X Square scores 80 for power against 79 for JOOLA Radius CGS 16. That comes from a 16 mm Polypropylene core swinging at 117 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 at 91 versus 89. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- CRBN-2X Square scores 96 for spin off its Raw T700 carbon peel-ply face, against 88 for the Charged Surface Technology carbon face on JOOLA Radius CGS 16. In practice an 8-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16, with the higher forgiveness score (90 vs 89). CRBN-2X Square actually carries the higher twist weight (7.1 vs 6.8), but JOOLA Radius CGS 16 makes it back on sweet spot (92) and overall face stability.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $1 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- CRBN-2X Square: 16 mm Polypropylene core with a Raw T700 carbon peel-ply face. JOOLA Radius CGS 16: 16 mm Reactive Polymer Core with a Charged Surface Technology carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16, at 5 in of handle against 4.75 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 90 and sweet spot 92 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. CRBN-2X Square rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 at 8.1 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (108 vs 117) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the JOOLA Radius CGS 16 to the CRBN-2X Square?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. CRBN-2X Square leads on twist weight by 12 points; everything else is within 8 points. At $229 vs $230, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- CRBN-2X Square vs Double Black Diamond Control
- CRBN-2X Square vs Infinity Ruby 16
- CRBN-2X Square vs TruFoam Genesis 2
- CRBN-2X Square vs CRBN-3X Power Series
- Radius CGS 16 vs Double Black Diamond Control V2
- Radius CGS 16 vs Vision CGS 16
- Radius CGS 16 vs Atlas 16
- Radius CGS 16 vs Ruby Hybrid 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put CRBN-2X Square and JOOLA Radius CGS 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: CRBN-2X Square and JOOLA Radius CGS 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.