CRBN-1X vs Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)

Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. CRBN-1X takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.

Add a third paddle to this comparison →

Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)

Proton

Series Four (Project Roadrunner)

86$175
Full review →

Quick answer

CRBN-1X edges it on the overall Paddle IQ score (87.5 vs 85.6), but the two split the scored categories — pick on the one trait you care about most.

Overall pick: CRBN-1X · $220 · IQ 87.5

Paddle DNA head-to-head

  • 89Power85
  • 89Control88
  • 94Spin95
  • 86Forgiveness82
  • 88Sweet spot84
  • 89Stability83
  • 71Maneuverability84
  • 83Pop82
  • 87Touch86
  • 89Consistency88
  • 79Swing weight68
  • 88Twist weight82
  • 57Launch angle57
  • 88Plow through78
  • 78Softness80

CRBN-1X vs Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) specs

Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.

Head-to-head specification comparison of the CRBN-1X and the Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner).
SpecCRBN-1XProton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
Street price(USD)$220$175 — better
IQ score(/ 100)87.5 — better85.6
Weight(oz)8.37.9
Core thickness(mm)1615
Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster119110
Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable6.6 — better6.3
Shapeelongatedelongated
Face length(in)16.516.5
Face width(in)7.47.375
Handle length(in)5.55.375
Grip circumference(in)4.254.25
SurfaceRaw Toray T700 carbonAerospace bi-directional carbon with exposed aramid weave
Core materialFoam-injected edge-wall polymerNomex and polypropylene hybrid honeycomb

CRBN-1X verdict

The spin-first elongated build for players who care about how a paddle is made. Foam-injected edge walls widen the sweet spot on a shape that usually punishes off-center contact.

Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) verdict

The exposed Kevlar weave is the story: it grips the ball like a fresh grit face but, unlike sprayed textures, it is the material itself, so the spin number does not decay over a season.

The verdict

Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is maneuverability: Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) scores 84 against 71 for CRBN-1X — a 13-point gap. They are effectively level on softness, control, spin, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) is $45 cheaper at $175.

  • Maneuverability

    Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) leads by 13 points (84 vs 71).

  • Swing weight

    CRBN-1X leads by 11 points (79 vs 68).

  • Plow through

    CRBN-1X leads by 10 points (88 vs 78).

  • Stability

    CRBN-1X leads by 6 points (89 vs 83).

Which one is right for your level?

Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.

Beginner

New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point

Narrow

CRBN-1X

CRBN-1X is a narrow pick at this level — forgiveness 86 vs 82, sweet spot 88 vs 84, stability 89 vs 83. Twist weight 6.6 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.

  • Forgiveness
  • Sweet spot
  • Stability
See the CRBN-1X

Intermediate

3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments

Toss-up

Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.1 vs 87.1 on the weighted index). Take Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) and keep the $45.

  • Maneuverability
  • Spin

Advanced / tournament

4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles

Toss-up

Too close to call on the traits that matter here (87.3 vs 86.3 on the weighted index). Take Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) and keep the $45.

  • Plow through
  • Power
  • Touch

Arm-sensitive players

Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load

Toss-up

Too close to call on the traits that matter here (82 vs 80.9 on the weighted index). Take Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) and keep the $45.

  • Forgiveness
  • Twist weight

Which one should you buy?

CRBN-1X

Take CRBN-1X if you want swing weight (+11), plow through (+10), stability (+6). Its swing weight of 119 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the CRBN-1X review →

Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)

Take Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) if you want maneuverability (+13). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 15 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) review →

CRBN-1X vs Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) FAQ

Which is better, the CRBN-1X or the Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)?
CRBN-1X carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.5 vs 85.6), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — maneuverability — Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) leads by 13 points.
Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner), at 110 kg·cm² swing weight against 119 for CRBN-1X. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
Which paddle has more power, the CRBN-1X or the Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)?
CRBN-1X scores 89 for power against 85 for Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner). That comes from a 16 mm Foam-injected edge-wall polymer core swinging at 119 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
Which one gives more control and touch?
CRBN-1X at 89 versus 88. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
Which paddle spins the ball more?
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) scores 95 for spin off its Aerospace bi-directional carbon with exposed aramid weave face, against 94 for the Raw Toray T700 carbon face on CRBN-1X. In practice a 1-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
CRBN-1X, with the higher forgiveness score (86 vs 82). Its 6.6 twist weight against 6.3 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
Is the price difference worth it?
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) costs $175, $45 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
Do they use the same core and face?
CRBN-1X: 16 mm Foam-injected edge-wall polymer core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face. Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner): 15 mm Nomex and polypropylene hybrid honeycomb core with an Aerospace bi-directional carbon with exposed aramid weave face.
Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
CRBN-1X, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.375 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which CRBN-1X avoids.
Which one is better for beginners?
CRBN-1X is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 86 and sweet spot 88 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
Which is lighter in the hand?
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) at 7.9 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (110 vs 119) is what you feel mid-rally.
Is it worth upgrading from the Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) to the CRBN-1X?
Only if you need what it actually adds. Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) leads on maneuverability by 13 points; everything else is within 11 points. At $220 vs $175, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.

Also worth comparing

Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.

Top alternatives to both

Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.

Guides featuring these paddles

Still deciding? These buying guides put CRBN-1X and Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) in context against the rest of the database.

Read the full reviews: CRBN-1X and Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner). Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.