JOOLA Perseus 14 vs Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 80Power83
- 86Control92
- 90Spin92
- 72Forgiveness79
- 70Sweet spot79
- 66Stability71
- 86Maneuverability87
- 76Pop75
- 88Touch92
- 75Consistency81
- 63Swing weight58
- 53Twist weight56
- 49Launch angle50
- 69Plow through69
- 85Softness84
Specs
| $120 | Price | $220 |
|---|---|---|
| 14 mm | Core | 16 mm |
| 7.8 oz | Weight | 8.15 oz |
| 108 | Swing weight | 105 |
| 5.7 | Twist weight | 5.8 |
| elongated | Shape | hybrid |
| Carbon Fiber | Surface | Double Diamond Tough Raw Carbon Fiber |
| 5.5 in | Handle | 5.5 in |
JOOLA Perseus 14 verdict
The 14 mm Perseus trades the 16 mm's plow-through for a firmer, faster response. It is the version to buy if you counter-attack rather than grind out drops.
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A verdict
The UPA-A revision brings the Coral Pro under the new pro-tour surface limits. It is measurably tamer than the original Coral Pro, and it is the version that is tournament-legal going forward.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is sweet spot: Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A scores 79 against 70 for JOOLA Perseus 14 — a 9-point gap. They are effectively level on power, twist weight, spin, so those traits should not decide the purchase. JOOLA Perseus 14 is $100 cheaper at $120.
Sweet spot
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A leads by 9 points (79 vs 70).
Forgiveness
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A leads by 7 points (79 vs 72).
Control
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A leads by 6 points (92 vs 86).
Consistency
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A leads by 6 points (81 vs 75).
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Perseus 14
Take JOOLA Perseus 14 if you want swing weight (+5). Its swing weight of 108 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Perseus 14 review →Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A
Take Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A if you want sweet spot (+9), forgiveness (+7), control (+6). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A review →JOOLA Perseus 14 vs Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Perseus 14 or the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (81.2 vs 76.8), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — sweet spot — Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A leads by 9 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A, at 105 kg·cm² swing weight against 108 for JOOLA Perseus 14. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Perseus 14 or the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A measures 83 on power against 80 for JOOLA Perseus 14. That comes from a 16 mm ProPulsion Foam core swinging at 105 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A at 92 versus 86. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A scores 92 for spin off its Double Diamond Tough Raw Carbon Fiber face, against 90 for the Carbon Fiber face on JOOLA Perseus 14. In practice a 2-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A, with 5.8 twist weight against 5.7. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A carries the higher forgiveness score (79) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- JOOLA Perseus 14 costs $120, $100 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Perseus 14: 14 mm Honeycomb Polypropylene Core core with a Carbon Fiber face. Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A: 16 mm ProPulsion Foam core with a Double Diamond Tough Raw Carbon Fiber face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- JOOLA Perseus 14, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which JOOLA Perseus 14 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 79 and sweet spot 79 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- JOOLA Perseus 14 at 7.8 oz against 8.15 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (108 vs 105) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the JOOLA Perseus 14 to the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A leads on sweet spot by 9 points; everything else is within 7 points. At $120 vs $220, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Perseus 14 vs Perseus Pro IV 14
- Perseus 14 vs Hyperion C2 CFS 16
- Perseus 14 vs GX2 Integra XL
- Perseus 14 vs Signature 13
- Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs Coral Hybrid 16
- Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs BALLR+ 16
- Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs Hyperion C2 CFS 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Perseus 14 and Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.