JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 vs Proton Series Two Project Flash
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Proton Series Two Project Flash wins this matchup for most players: it takes hand speed and value on Paddle DNA against the JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16, which costs $250.
Power
Too close to call
86 vs 84
Spin
Too close to call
92 vs 92
Control
Too close to call
88 vs 88
Forgiveness
Too close to call
84 vs 84
Hand speed
Proton Series Two Project Flash
111 vs 114 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Proton Series Two Project Flash
$200 at IQ 85.3 vs $250 at IQ 86
Overall pick: Proton Series Two Project Flash · $200 · IQ 85.3
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 86Power84
- 88Control88
- 92Spin92
- 84Forgiveness84
- 86Sweet spot86
- 86Stability84
- 78Maneuverability80
- 82Pop80
- 86Touch86
- 88Consistency88
- 74Swing weight70
- 84Twist weight80
- 54Launch angle50
- 84Plow through80
- 74Softness80
JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 vs Proton Series Two Project Flash specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 | Proton Series Two Project Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $250 | $200 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 86 — better | 85.3 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.1 | 8 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 114 | 111 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.6 | 6.7 — better |
| Shape | hybrid | hybrid |
| Face length(in) | 16.3 | 16.3 |
| Face width(in) | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.4 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw Toray T700 carbon friction | Gritted raw carbon |
| Core material | Propulsion core with foam edge | Thermoformed polymer honeycomb |
JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 verdict
The Mod platform splits the difference between Perseus control and Magnus power. Spin 92 with control 88 is a rare pairing, and the 16.3 in hybrid keeps hand speed usable.
Proton Series Two Project Flash verdict
The grittiest face Proton has made. Spin 92 puts it in the top tier of the database, and the hybrid shape keeps it usable at the kitchen line.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is softness: Proton Series Two Project Flash scores 80 against 74 for JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 — a 6-point gap. They are effectively level on power, stability, maneuverability, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Proton Series Two Project Flash is $50 cheaper at $200.
Softness
Proton Series Two Project Flash leads by 6 points (80 vs 74).
Swing weight
JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 leads by 4 points (74 vs 70).
Twist weight
JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 leads by 4 points (84 vs 80).
Launch angle
JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 leads by 4 points (54 vs 50).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (84.8 vs 85.7 on the weighted index). Take Proton Series Two Project Flash and keep the $50.
- Twist weight
- Stability
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86 vs 85.9 on the weighted index). Take Proton Series Two Project Flash and keep the $50.
- Maneuverability
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (85.3 vs 86.2 on the weighted index). Take Proton Series Two Project Flash and keep the $50.
- Plow through
- Power
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Proton Series Two Project Flash
Proton Series Two Project Flash is a narrow pick at this level — softness 80 vs 74. Its 16 mm Thermoformed polymer honeycomb core at 8 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
Proton Series Two Project Flash
Take Proton Series Two Project Flash if you want softness (+6). Its swing weight of 111 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Proton Series Two Project Flash review →JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16
Take JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 if you want swing weight (+4), twist weight (+4), launch angle (+4). Its swing weight of 114 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 review →Proton Series Two Project Flash vs JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Proton Series Two Project Flash or the JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16?
- JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (86 vs 85.3), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — softness — Proton Series Two Project Flash leads by 6 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Proton Series Two Project Flash, at 111 kg·cm² swing weight against 114 for JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Proton Series Two Project Flash or the JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16?
- JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 scores 86 for power against 84 for Proton Series Two Project Flash. That comes from a 16 mm Propulsion core with foam edge core swinging at 114 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 88 for control.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 92 for spin.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 84 on forgiveness despite twist weights of 6.7 and 6.6.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Proton Series Two Project Flash costs $200, $50 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Proton Series Two Project Flash: 16 mm Thermoformed polymer honeycomb core with a Gritted raw carbon face. JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16: 16 mm Propulsion core with foam edge core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon friction face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.4 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Forgiveness (84) and sweet spot (86) are identical, so a developing player can start on either — decide on price and handle feel.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Proton Series Two Project Flash at 8 oz against 8.1 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (111 vs 114) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Proton Series Two Project Flash to the JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Proton Series Two Project Flash leads on softness by 6 points; everything else is within 4 points. At $200 vs $250, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Series Two Project Flash vs Scorpeus Pro IV 16
- Series Two Project Flash vs Ruby Hybrid 16
- Series Two Project Flash vs Crush Control 16
- Series Two Project Flash vs Pursuit Ultra MX 6.0
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 and Proton Series Two Project Flash in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Mod TA-15 3S 16 and Proton Series Two Project Flash. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.