Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power vs LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate of specialty retailers, we may earn from qualifying purchases — full disclosure.
Quick answer
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm wins this matchup for most players: it takes power, spin, forgiveness and value on Paddle DNA against the Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power, which costs $210.
Power
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
93 vs 88
Spin
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
88 vs 82
Control
Too close to call
81 vs 78
Forgiveness
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
80 vs 74
Hand speed
Too close to call
122 vs 123 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
$179 at IQ 82.1 vs $210 at IQ 80.4
Overall pick: LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm · $179 · IQ 82.1
Paddle DNA head-to-head
Estimated scores: the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm Paddle DNA is our estimate from published specs, not a sourced profile.
- 88Power93
- 81Control78
- 82Spin88
- 74Forgiveness80
- 76Sweet spot81
- 86Stability84
- 68Maneuverability68
- 88Pop92
- 76Touch77
- 81Consistency80
- 82Swing weight82
- 82Twist weight80
- 52Launch angle61
- 89Plow through91
- 58Softness69
Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power vs LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power | LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $210 | $179 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 80.4 | 82.1 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8.4 | 7.93 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 14 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 123 | 122 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.5 — better | 6.3 |
| Shape | elongated | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.54 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 7.48 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.52 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4 | 4.13 |
| Surface | Solid-span carbon | Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit |
| Core material | Coreless carbon | XPOP modified foam |
Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power verdict
A more livable Gearbox. It keeps most of the drive velocity of the Pro Power while adding enough stability to survive hands battles.
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm verdict
A head-loaded offensive option with listed swing weight 122 ±3 despite a 7.93 oz average static weight. XPOP is designed for lively rebound; soft resets require touch. Estimated DNA is not proof of a measured power or spin win over Spitfire.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is softness: LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm scores 69 against 58 for Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power — an 11-point gap. They are effectively level on control, stability, twist weight, so those traits should not decide the purchase. LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm is $31 cheaper at $179.
Softness
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 11 points (69 vs 58).
Launch angle
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 9 points (61 vs 52).
Spin
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 6 points (88 vs 82).
Forgiveness
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 6 points (80 vs 74).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (79.2 vs 80.7 on the weighted index). Take LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm and keep the $31.
- Forgiveness
- Sweet spot
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm is a narrow pick at this level — spin 88 vs 82, forgiveness 80 vs 74, power 93 vs 88. At 122 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Spin
- Forgiveness
- Power
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm is a narrow pick at this level — spin 88 vs 82, power 93 vs 88, plow through 91 vs 89. Swing weight 122 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Spin
- Power
- Plow through
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm is the clearer pick at this level — softness 69 vs 58, forgiveness 80 vs 74. Its 16 mm XPOP modified foam core at 7.93 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
Which one should you buy?
Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power
Take Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power if you prefer a 5.5 in handle and a 14 mm Coreless carbon core — it gives up nothing measurable to LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm.
Read the Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power review →LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Take LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm if you want softness (+11), launch angle (+9), spin (+6). Its swing weight of 122 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm review →Where to Buy
Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power vs LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm FAQ
- Which is better, the Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power or the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (82.1 vs 80.4), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — softness — LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 11 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm, at 122 kg·cm² swing weight against 123 for Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power or the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm scores 93 for power against 88 for Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power. That comes from a 16 mm XPOP modified foam core swinging at 122 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power at 81 versus 78. Its 14 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm scores 88 for spin off its Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit face, against 82 for the Solid-span carbon face on Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power. In practice a 6-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm, with the higher forgiveness score (80 vs 74). Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power actually carries the higher twist weight (6.5 vs 6.3), but LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm makes it back on sweet spot (81) and overall face stability.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm costs $179, $31 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power: 14 mm Coreless carbon core with a Solid-span carbon face. LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm: 16 mm XPOP modified foam core with a Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm, at 5.52 in of handle against 5.5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 80 and sweet spot 81 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm at 7.93 oz against 8.4 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (122 vs 123) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power to the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads on softness by 11 points; everything else is within 9 points. At $210 vs $179, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- CX14E Ultimate Power vs Pro Power Elongated
- CX14E Ultimate Power vs CX14H Ultimate Power
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Spitfire Elongated 16mm
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Loco 2 Hybrid 16mm
- CX14E Ultimate Power vs Perseus POWER FX 16mm
- CX14E Ultimate Power vs Power Pro X 14
- CX14E Ultimate Power vs Evoke Premier Pro
- CX14E Ultimate Power vs Warrior Edge 14
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- CX14E Ultimate Power vs Pro XS 16
- CX14E Ultimate Power vs Hyperion CFS 16
- CX14E Ultimate Power vs Pro Integra Power 16
- CX14E Ultimate Power vs GX2 Power Elongated
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs GX2 Power Elongated
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Pro XS 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Vantage Power 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Labs Project 006
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power and LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Gearbox CX14E Ultimate Power and LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.