Franklin Signature 16 Composite vs ONIX Evoke Premier
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. ONIX Evoke Premier takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
ONIX Evoke Premier edges it on the overall Paddle IQ score (81.7 vs 73.5), but the two split the scored categories — pick on the one trait you care about most.
Power
Too close to call
83 vs 81
Spin
78 vs 68
Control
Too close to call
84 vs 83
Forgiveness
84 vs 72
Hand speed
Franklin Signature 16 Composite
110 vs 113 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Franklin Signature 16 Composite
$70 at IQ 73.5 vs $180 at IQ 81.7
Overall pick: ONIX Evoke Premier · $180 · IQ 81.7
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 81Power83
- 83Control84
- 68Spin78
- 72Forgiveness84
- 70Sweet spot85
- 67Stability83
- 80Maneuverability76
- 76Pop82
- 84Touch80
- 74Consistency82
- 66Swing weight68
- 50Twist weight80
- 52Launch angle60
- 75Plow through78
- 86Softness78
Franklin Signature 16 Composite vs ONIX Evoke Premier specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Franklin Signature 16 Composite | ONIX Evoke Premier |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $70 — better | $180 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 73.5 | 81.7 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 110 | 113 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 5.6 | 6.4 — better |
| Shape | elongated | standard |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 15.9 |
| Face width(in) | 7.3 | 8 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.6 | 5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.5 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Composite/Fiberglass | Textured carbon |
| Core material | Polypropylene | Precision polymer |
Franklin Signature 16 Composite verdict
A fiberglass-faced elongated paddle at a rec-league price. Composite faces give up spin to carbon, but they hand back free pop that beginners actually benefit from.
ONIX Evoke Premier verdict
An underrated standard-shape all-rounder. It rewards players who make clean contact in the middle of the face and does nothing badly.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is twist weight: ONIX Evoke Premier scores 80 against 50 for Franklin Signature 16 Composite — a 30-point gap. They are effectively level on plow through, power, swing weight, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Franklin Signature 16 Composite is $110 cheaper at $70.
Twist weight
ONIX Evoke Premier leads by 30 points (80 vs 50).
Stability
ONIX Evoke Premier leads by 16 points (83 vs 67).
Sweet spot
ONIX Evoke Premier leads by 15 points (85 vs 70).
Forgiveness
ONIX Evoke Premier leads by 12 points (84 vs 72).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
ONIX Evoke Premier
ONIX Evoke Premier is the clearer pick at this level — twist weight 80 vs 50, sweet spot 85 vs 70, forgiveness 84 vs 72. Twist weight 6.4 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Twist weight
- Sweet spot
- Forgiveness
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
ONIX Evoke Premier
ONIX Evoke Premier is a narrow pick at this level — spin 78 vs 68, forgiveness 84 vs 72, consistency 82 vs 74. At 113 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Spin
- Forgiveness
- Consistency
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
ONIX Evoke Premier
ONIX Evoke Premier is a narrow pick at this level — spin 78 vs 68, plow through 78 vs 75, power 83 vs 81. Swing weight 113 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Spin
- Plow through
- Power
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
ONIX Evoke Premier
ONIX Evoke Premier is a narrow pick at this level — twist weight 80 vs 50, forgiveness 84 vs 72. Its 16 mm Precision polymer core at 8.2 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Twist weight
- Forgiveness
Which one should you buy?
Franklin Signature 16 Composite
Take Franklin Signature 16 Composite if you want softness (+8), maneuverability (+4), touch (+4). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Franklin Signature 16 Composite review →ONIX Evoke Premier
Take ONIX Evoke Premier if you want twist weight (+30), stability (+16), sweet spot (+15). Its swing weight of 113 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the ONIX Evoke Premier review →Franklin Signature 16 Composite vs ONIX Evoke Premier FAQ
- Which is better, the Franklin Signature 16 Composite or the ONIX Evoke Premier?
- ONIX Evoke Premier carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (81.7 vs 73.5), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — twist weight — ONIX Evoke Premier leads by 30 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Franklin Signature 16 Composite, at 110 kg·cm² swing weight against 113 for ONIX Evoke Premier. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Franklin Signature 16 Composite or the ONIX Evoke Premier?
- ONIX Evoke Premier scores 83 for power against 81 for Franklin Signature 16 Composite. That comes from a 16 mm Precision polymer core swinging at 113 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- ONIX Evoke Premier at 84 versus 83. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- ONIX Evoke Premier scores 78 for spin off its Textured carbon face, against 68 for the Composite/Fiberglass face on Franklin Signature 16 Composite. In practice a 10-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- ONIX Evoke Premier, with the higher forgiveness score (84 vs 72). Its 6.4 twist weight against 5.6 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Franklin Signature 16 Composite costs $70, $110 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Franklin Signature 16 Composite: 16 mm Polypropylene core with a Composite/Fiberglass face. ONIX Evoke Premier: 16 mm Precision polymer core with a Textured carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Franklin Signature 16 Composite, at 5.6 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Franklin Signature 16 Composite avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- ONIX Evoke Premier is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 84 and sweet spot 85 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Franklin Signature 16 Composite rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Franklin Signature 16 Composite at 8.1 oz against 8.2 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (110 vs 113) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Franklin Signature 16 Composite to the ONIX Evoke Premier?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. ONIX Evoke Premier leads on twist weight by 30 points; everything else is within 16 points. At $70 vs $180, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Signature 16 Composite vs Signature Carbon STR
- Evoke Premier vs Z5 Graphite
- Evoke Premier vs Evoke Premier Pro
- Evoke Premier vs V1100 16
- Signature 16 Composite vs SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0
- Signature 16 Composite vs Radical Tour Ultra 16
- Signature 16 Composite vs Ben Johns Signature Pro
- Signature 16 Composite vs Flare Graphite
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Signature 16 Composite vs Perseus Pro IV 14
- Signature 16 Composite vs Perseus 14
- Signature 16 Composite vs Signature 13
- Signature 16 Composite vs J6CR
- Evoke Premier vs V7 Hybrid
- Evoke Premier vs Extreme Tour 16
- Evoke Premier vs V7 Pro 16
- Evoke Premier vs Prism Flash V2 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Franklin Signature 16 Composite and ONIX Evoke Premier in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Franklin Signature 16 Composite and ONIX Evoke Premier. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.