Engage Encore Pro EX vs Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Engage Encore Pro EX takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 70Power76
- 88Control82
- 74Spin74
- 89Forgiveness84
- 90Sweet spot85
- 80Stability77
- 84Maneuverability82
- 66Pop79
- 86Touch76
- 85Consistency80
- 50Swing weight52
- 74Twist weight70
- 68Launch angle64
- 60Plow through64
- 90Softness82
Specs
| $130 | Price | $80 |
|---|---|---|
| 16 mm | Core | 16 mm |
| 7.8 oz | Weight | 7.8 oz |
| 105 | Swing weight | 106 |
| 5.9 | Twist weight | 5.9 |
| standard | Shape | hybrid |
| Fiberglass composite | Surface | Fiberglass composite |
| 5 in | Handle | 5 in |
Engage Encore Pro EX verdict
A soft, light, extremely forgiving paddle that has quietly become the default recommendation for players over 60.
Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 verdict
A genuinely balanced sub-$100 paddle. Nothing about it is elite, but nothing is a liability either, which is rare at this price.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is pop: Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 scores 79 against 66 for Engage Encore Pro EX — a 13-point gap. They are effectively level on stability, maneuverability, swing weight, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 is $50 cheaper at $80.
Pop
Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 leads by 13 points (79 vs 66).
Touch
Engage Encore Pro EX leads by 10 points (86 vs 76).
Softness
Engage Encore Pro EX leads by 8 points (90 vs 82).
Power
Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 leads by 6 points (76 vs 70).
Which one should you buy?
Engage Encore Pro EX
Take Engage Encore Pro EX if you want touch (+10), softness (+8), control (+6). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Engage Encore Pro EX review →Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0
Take Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 if you want pop (+13), power (+6), plow through (+4). Its swing weight of 106 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 review →Engage Encore Pro EX vs Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 FAQ
- Which is better, the Engage Encore Pro EX or the Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0?
- Engage Encore Pro EX carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (80.9 vs 78.4), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — pop — Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 leads by 13 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Engage Encore Pro EX, at 105 kg·cm² swing weight against 106 for Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Engage Encore Pro EX or the Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0?
- Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 measures 76 on power against 70 for Engage Encore Pro EX. That comes from a 16 mm Rev-Core polymer core swinging at 106 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Engage Encore Pro EX at 88 versus 82. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Engage Encore Pro EX scores 74 for spin off its Fiberglass composite face, against 74 for the Fiberglass composite face on Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0. In practice a 0-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Engage Encore Pro EX, with 5.9 twist weight against 5.9. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Engage Encore Pro EX carries the higher forgiveness score (89) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 costs $80, $50 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Engage Encore Pro EX: 16 mm Control core core with a Fiberglass composite face. Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0: 16 mm Rev-Core polymer core with a Fiberglass composite face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Engage Encore Pro EX, at 5 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Engage Encore Pro EX is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 89 and sweet spot 90 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Engage Encore Pro EX at 7.8 oz against 7.8 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (105 vs 106) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 to the Engage Encore Pro EX?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 leads on pop by 13 points; everything else is within 10 points. At $130 vs $80, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Encore Pro EX vs Essentials 16
- Encore Pro EX vs Prism Flash
- Encore Pro EX vs Tempest Wave V3
- Encore Pro EX vs SLK Halo Control
- SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 vs Signature Carbon STR
- SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 vs Prism Flash
- SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 vs Essentials 16
- SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0 vs Ben Johns Signature Pro
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: Engage Encore Pro EX and Selkirk SLK Evo Hybrid 2.0. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.