CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 wins this matchup for most players: it takes control, hand speed and value on Paddle DNA against the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, which costs $332.99.
Power
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
95 vs 87
Spin
Too close to call
92 vs 91
Control
89 vs 84
Forgiveness
Too close to call
89 vs 88
Hand speed
113 vs 118 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$280 at IQ 87.9 vs $332.99 at IQ 87.1
Overall pick: CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 · $280 · IQ 87.9
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 87Power95
- 89Control84
- 92Spin91
- 89Forgiveness88
- 91Sweet spot89
- 90Stability92
- 74Maneuverability66
- 79Pop90
- 88Touch80
- 89Consistency85
- 78Swing weight82
- 91Twist weight92
- 58Launch angle58
- 82Plow through93
- 89Softness72
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 | Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $280 — better | $332.99 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 87.9 — better | 87.1 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.3 | 8.25 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 14 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 113 | 118 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 7 | 7.2 — better |
| Shape | standard | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16 | 16.5 |
| Face width(in) | 7.9 | 7.45 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5.8 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.125 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw T700 carbon | Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit |
| Core material | TruFoam full-foam core | BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring |
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 verdict
The forgiving shape in the Genesis line. It trades the elongated model's reach for a wide face, the highest twist weight of the three, and a noticeably easier reset at the kitchen.
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 verdict
The highest power score in the database, and the twist weight (7.2) to back it up. The MOI tuning system lets you dial the balance, but nothing turns a 118 swing weight into a fast-hands paddle.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is softness: CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 scores 89 against 72 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 — a 17-point gap. They are effectively level on sweet spot, stability, spin, so those traits should not decide the purchase. CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 is $52.99000000000001 cheaper at $280.
Softness
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 leads by 17 points (89 vs 72).
Pop
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 11 points (90 vs 79).
Plow through
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 11 points (93 vs 82).
Power
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 8 points (95 vs 87).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (89.9 vs 88.7 on the weighted index). Take CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 and keep the $52.99000000000001.
- Consistency
- Sweet spot
- Control
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 is a narrow pick at this level — maneuverability 74 vs 66, touch 88 vs 80, control 89 vs 84. At 113 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Maneuverability
- Touch
- Control
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86 vs 86.3 on the weighted index). Take CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 and keep the $52.99000000000001.
- Plow through
- Power
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 is the clearer pick at this level — softness 89 vs 72, forgiveness 89 vs 88. Its 14 mm TruFoam full-foam core at 8.3 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
Which one should you buy?
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2
Take CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 if you want softness (+17), maneuverability (+8), touch (+8). Its swing weight of 113 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 review →Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
Take Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 if you want pop (+11), plow through (+11), power (+8). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 review →CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.9 vs 87.1), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — softness — CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 leads by 17 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2, at 113 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 95 for power against 87 for CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2. That comes from a 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core swinging at 118 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 at 89 versus 84. Its 14 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 scores 92 for spin off its Raw T700 carbon face, against 91 for the Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face on Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. In practice a 1-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2, with the higher forgiveness score (89 vs 88). Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 actually carries the higher twist weight (7.2 vs 7), but CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 makes it back on sweet spot (91) and overall face stability.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 costs $280, $52.99000000000001 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2: 14 mm TruFoam full-foam core with a Raw T700 carbon face. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16: 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core with a Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, at 5.8 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 89 and sweet spot 91 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 at 8.25 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (118 vs 113) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 to the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 leads on softness by 17 points; everything else is within 11 points. At $280 vs $332.99, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 vs Honolulu J2CR
- TruFoam Genesis 2 vs TruFoam Genesis 1
- TruFoam Genesis 2 vs TruFoam Genesis 3
- TruFoam Genesis 2 vs CRBN⁴ TruFoam Barrage
- TruFoam Genesis 2 vs Coral Pro
- TruFoam Genesis 2 vs Double Black Diamond Control
- TruFoam Genesis 2 vs Perseus Pro IV 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- TruFoam Genesis 2 vs Coral Pro
- TruFoam Genesis 2 vs OMNI 16
- TruFoam Genesis 2 vs CRBN-3X Power Series
- TruFoam Genesis 2 vs Infinity Ruby 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Ultré Power 2
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs 1X TruFoam Power
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Hyperion Pro V 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Labs 008 Project 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: CRBN TruFoam Genesis 2 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.

