JOOLA Radius CGS 16 vs Ronbus Tenon
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Ronbus Tenon takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 79Power88
- 91Control91
- 88Spin90
- 90Forgiveness88
- 92Sweet spot89
- 86Stability88
- 78Maneuverability78
- 74Pop83
- 89Touch89
- 88Consistency90
- 68Swing weight72
- 82Twist weight86
- 50Launch angle54
- 78Plow through82
- 82Softness85
JOOLA Radius CGS 16 vs Ronbus Tenon specs
Every measured spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Radius CGS 16 | Ronbus Tenon |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $230 | $180 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 86.1 | 87.8 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8.1 | 8 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 108 | 110 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.8 — better | 6.7 |
| Shape | widebody | hybrid |
| Face length(in) | 15.9 | 16.3 |
| Face width(in) | 8.1 | 7.6 |
| Handle length(in) | 5 | 5.5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Charged Surface Technology carbon | Raw T700 carbon |
| Core material | Reactive Polymer Core | Foam-perimeter thermoformed polymer |
JOOLA Radius CGS 16 verdict
JOOLA's widebody answer to the elongated arms race. The extra face width buys one of the largest measured sweet spots in the lineup, and the twist weight is high enough that mishits still come back deep.
Ronbus Tenon verdict
Ronbus doing what Ronbus does: a flagship-tier build at a mid-tier price. The Tenon lands closest to the premium all-court paddles on measured traits while costing about $100 less.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is power: Ronbus Tenon scores 88 against 79 for JOOLA Radius CGS 16 — a 9-point gap. They are effectively level on sweet spot, softness, spin, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Ronbus Tenon is $50 cheaper at $180.
Power
Ronbus Tenon leads by 9 points (88 vs 79).
Pop
Ronbus Tenon leads by 9 points (83 vs 74).
Swing weight
Ronbus Tenon leads by 4 points (72 vs 68).
Twist weight
Ronbus Tenon leads by 4 points (86 vs 82).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (88.4 vs 88.5 on the weighted index). Take Ronbus Tenon and keep the $50.
- Twist weight
- Stability
- Consistency
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86 vs 87.4 on the weighted index). Take Ronbus Tenon and keep the $50.
- Power
- Spin
- Consistency
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Ronbus Tenon
Ronbus Tenon is a narrow pick at this level — power 88 vs 79, plow through 82 vs 78, spin 90 vs 88. Swing weight 110 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Power
- Plow through
- Spin
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (84.2 vs 86 on the weighted index). Take Ronbus Tenon and keep the $50.
- Softness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Radius CGS 16
Take JOOLA Radius CGS 16 if you prefer a widebody face and a 5 in handle — it gives up nothing measurable to Ronbus Tenon.
Read the JOOLA Radius CGS 16 review →Ronbus Tenon
Take Ronbus Tenon if you want power (+9), pop (+9), swing weight (+4). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Ronbus Tenon review →JOOLA Radius CGS 16 vs Ronbus Tenon FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Radius CGS 16 or the Ronbus Tenon?
- Ronbus Tenon carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.8 vs 86.1), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — power — Ronbus Tenon leads by 9 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16, at 108 kg·cm² swing weight against 110 for Ronbus Tenon. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Radius CGS 16 or the Ronbus Tenon?
- Ronbus Tenon measures 88 on power against 79 for JOOLA Radius CGS 16. That comes from a 16 mm Foam-perimeter thermoformed polymer core swinging at 110 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 at 91 versus 91. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Ronbus Tenon scores 90 for spin off its Raw T700 carbon face, against 88 for the Charged Surface Technology carbon face on JOOLA Radius CGS 16. In practice a 2-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16, with 6.8 twist weight against 6.7. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and JOOLA Radius CGS 16 carries the higher forgiveness score (90) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Ronbus Tenon costs $180, $50 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16: 16 mm Reactive Polymer Core core with a Charged Surface Technology carbon face. Ronbus Tenon: 16 mm Foam-perimeter thermoformed polymer core with a Raw T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Ronbus Tenon, at 5.5 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Ronbus Tenon avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 90 and sweet spot 92 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Ronbus Tenon rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Ronbus Tenon at 8 oz against 8.1 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (110 vs 108) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the JOOLA Radius CGS 16 to the Ronbus Tenon?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Ronbus Tenon leads on power by 9 points; everything else is within 9 points. At $230 vs $180, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Radius CGS 16 vs Sapphire 16
- Radius CGS 16 vs V-Sol Pro 16
- Radius CGS 16 vs Pursuit Ultra MX 6.0
- Radius CGS 16 vs Magnus 3S 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Radius CGS 16 and Ronbus Tenon. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.