Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 78Power85
- 91Control90
- 86Spin84
- 88Forgiveness88
- 88Sweet spot89
- 86Stability85
- 72Maneuverability84
- 71Pop84
- 90Touch88
- 89Consistency89
- 74Swing weight66
- 85Twist weight84
- 53Launch angle54
- 79Plow through74
- 89Softness86
Specs
| $220 | Price | $200 |
|---|---|---|
| 16 mm | Core | 14 mm |
| 8.3 oz | Weight | 7.7 oz |
| 118 | Swing weight | 105 |
| 6.5 | Twist weight | 6.9 |
| elongated | Shape | standard |
| Specialized carbon | Surface | Textured carbon |
| 5.5 in | Handle | 5.25 in |
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 verdict
Engage's dwell-time engineering is real: the ball sits on the face long enough to shape shots that other elongated paddles simply cannot.
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 verdict
The lightweight Bantam. At 7.7 oz it is one of the fastest paddles in the database through hands battles, and Paddletek's core keeps the feel soft rather than tinny.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is pop: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 scores 84 against 71 for Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 — a 13-point gap. They are effectively level on softness, spin, touch, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is $20 cheaper at $200.
Pop
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 13 points (84 vs 71).
Maneuverability
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 12 points (84 vs 72).
Swing weight
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 leads by 8 points (74 vs 66).
Power
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 7 points (85 vs 78).
Which one should you buy?
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 if you want pop (+13), maneuverability (+12), power (+7). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 review →Engage Pursuit MX 6.0
Take Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 if you want swing weight (+8), plow through (+5). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 FAQ
- Which is better, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 or the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (86.3 vs 85.2), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — pop — Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 13 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, at 105 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for Engage Pursuit MX 6.0. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 or the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 measures 85 on power against 78 for Engage Pursuit MX 6.0. That comes from a 14 mm Bantam polymer core core swinging at 105 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 at 91 versus 90. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 scores 86 for spin off its Specialized carbon face, against 84 for the Textured carbon face on Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. In practice a 2-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, with 6.9 twist weight against 6.5. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 carries the higher forgiveness score (88) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 costs $200, $20 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14: 14 mm Bantam polymer core core with a Textured carbon face. Engage Pursuit MX 6.0: 16 mm Control Pro core core with a Specialized carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Engage Pursuit MX 6.0, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 89 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 at 7.7 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (105 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 to the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads on pop by 13 points; everything else is within 12 points. At $200 vs $220, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Double Black Diamond Control
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Mach 1 Forza 16
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Luxx Control Air
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Quartz Control
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Magnus 3S 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Loco 16mm Standard
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Mach 1 Forza 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.